Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine

Original Article

Cytopathologic features of human papillomavirus–independent, gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma: Min-Kyung Yeo, Go Eun Bae, Dong-Hyun Kim, In-Ock Seong, Kwang-Sun Suh; J Pathol Transl Med. 2022;56(5):260-269. Published online September 13, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2022.07.05

1,994 View
123 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

Background
Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (GEA) is unrelated to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and is clinically aggressive compared with HPV-associated usual-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (UEA). The cytological diagnosis falls short of a definitive diagnosis of GEA and is often categorized as atypical glandular cells (AGCs). To improve cytologic recognition, cytological findings of HPV-independent GEA were analyzed and the results compared with HPV-associated UEA.
Methods
Cervical Papanicolaou (Pap) smears from eight patients with a histopathologic diagnosis of GEA and 12 control cases of UEA were reviewed. All slides were conventionally prepared and/or liquid-based prepared (ThinPrep) and stained following the Pap method. A mucinous background, architectural, nuclear, and cytoplasmic features were analyzed and compared with UEA.
Results
Preoperative cytologic diagnoses of the eight GEA cases were AGCs, favor neoplastic in three cases, adenocarcinoma in situ in one case, and adenocarcinoma in four cases. Cytologically, monolayered honeycomb-like sheets (p = .002) of atypical endocervical cells with vacuolar granular cytoplasm (p = .001) were extensive in GEA, and three-dimensional clusters (p = .010) were extensive in UEA. Although the differences were not statistically significant, background mucin (p = .058), vesicular nuclei (p = .057), and golden-brown intracytoplasmic mucin (p = .089) were also discriminatory findings for GEA versus UEA.
Conclusions
Although GEA is difficult to diagnose on cytologic screening, GEA can be recognized based on cytologic features of monolayered honeycomb sheets of atypical endocervical cells with abundant vacuolar cytoplasm and some golden-brown intracytoplasmic mucin. UEA cases are characterized by three-dimensional clusters.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Risk Factors Affecting Clinical Outcomes of Low-risk Early-stage Human Papillomavirus–Associated Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Treated by Surgery Alone: Application of Silva Pattern
Bong Kyung Bae, Hyunsik Bae, Won Kyung Cho, Byoung-Gie Kim, Chel Hun Choi, Tae-Joong Kim, Yoo-Young Lee, Jeong-Won Lee, Hyun-Soo Kim, Won Park
International Journal of Gynecological Pathology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef

Case Study

Concurrent Anti-glomerular Basement Membrane Nephritis and IgA Nephropathy: Kwang-Sun Suh, Song-Yi Choi, Go Eun Bae, Dae Eun Choi, Min-kyung Yeo; J Pathol Transl Med. 2019;53(6):399-402. Published online September 16, 2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2019.08.05

5,012 View
165 Download
9 Web of Science
10 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Anti–glomerular basement membrane (GBM) nephritis is characterized by circulating anti-GBM antibodies and crescentic glomerulonephritis (GN) with deposition of IgG along the GBM. In a limited number of cases, glomerular immune complexes have been identified in anti-GBM nephritis. A 38-year-old female presented azotemia, hematuria, and proteinuria without any pulmonary symptoms. A renal biopsy showed crescentic GN with linear IgG deposition along the GBM and mesangial IgA deposition. The patient was diagnosed as concurrent anti-GBM nephritis and IgA nephropathy. Therapies with pulse methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide administration were effective. Concurrent cases of both anti-GBM nephritis and IgA nephropathy are rare among cases of anti-GBM diseases with deposition of immune complexes. This rare case of concurrent anti-GBM nephritis and IgA nephropathy with literature review is noteworthy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Coexistence of anti-glomerular basement membrane disease and IgA nephropathy: an illustrative case and comprehensive literature review
Zewei Chen, Dechao Xu, Fangzheng Cui, Huihui Hou, Zhiguo Mao, Xiang Gao
Renal Failure.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Anti-glomerular basement membrane vasculitis
Claudio Ponticelli, Marta Calatroni, Gabriella Moroni
Autoimmunity Reviews.2023; 22(1): 103212. CrossRef
High-frequency plasma exchange therapy for immunocompromised, type I crescentic glomerulonephritis complicated with IgA nephropathy: A case report and literature review
Huihui Chen, Jingjing Jin, Mei Juan Cheng, Lei He, Wei Zhou, Liping Guo, Zhe Zhe Niu, Xiang Nan Liang, Rong Fang Zhu, Yaling Bai, Jin Sheng Xu
Medicine.2023; 102(3): e32698. CrossRef
Clinical and immunological characteristics of patients with combined anti-glomerular basement membrane disease and IgA nephropathy
Cong-rong Shen, Xiao-yu Jia, Zhao Cui, Xiao-juan Yu, Ming-hui Zhao
Clinical Kidney Journal.2023; 16(9): 1480. CrossRef
Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease with IgA nephropathy: A case report
Chuan Guo, Ming Ye, Shen Li, Ting-Ting Zhu, Xiang-Rong Rao
World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(12): 3916. CrossRef
Case Report: Coexistence of Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Disease, Membranous Nephropathy, and IgA Nephropathy in a Female PatientWith Preserved Renal Function
Wei Qu, Nan Liu, Tianhua Xu, Binyao Tian, Meng Wang, Yanqiu Li, Jianfei Ma, Li Yao
Frontiers in Pharmacology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Great prognosis of concurrent anti-GBM disease and IgA nephropathy in a young woman: A case report
Fu Shaojie, Su Sensen, Huang Jingda, Wang Luyu, Zhang Fei, Yu Jinyu, Xu Zhonggao, Wu Hao
Medicine.2022; 101(37): e30686. CrossRef
Serodiagnosis of Anti-glomerular Basement Membrane Disease Using a Newly Developed Chemiluminescence Immunoassay
Alexander Kühnl, Lea Hartwig, Cornelia Dähnrich, Wolfgang Schlumberger
Frontiers in Medicine.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
PATHOLOGY AND RENAL OUTCOME OF THREE UNCOMMON FACES OF CRESCENTRIC GLOMERULONEPHRITIS
Keya Basu, Dipankar Sircar, Manimoy Bandopadhyay
INDIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH.2021; : 7. CrossRef
Pneumocystis pneumonia secondary to intensive immunosuppression treatment for anti-GBM disease complicated with IgA nephropathy
Manyu Zhang, Dingwei Yang, Weixiu Wang, Fuhao Zhao, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Xue Li
Medicine.2021; 100(45): e27728. CrossRef

Brief Case Report

Peritoneal Fluid Cytology of Disseminated Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Combined with Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma of the Endometrium: Yong-Moon Lee, Min-Kyung Yeo, Song-Yi Choi, Kyung-Hee Kim, Kwang-Sun Suh; J Pathol Transl Med. 2019;53(6):407-410. Published online September 16, 2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2019.07.29

4,105 View
79 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Comparison of Metastatic Patterns Among Neuroendocrine Tumors, Neuroendocrine Carcinomas, and Nonneuroendocrine Carcinomas of Various Primary Organs
Hyung Kyu Park, Ghee Young Kwon
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2023;[Epub] CrossRef

Original Article

Clinical Significance of an HPV DNA Chip Test with Emphasis on HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 Detection in Korean Gynecological Patients: Min-Kyung Yeo, Ahwon Lee, Soo Young Hur, Jong Sup Park; J Pathol Transl Med. 2016;50(4):294-299. Published online June 26, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2016.05.09

7,870 View
77 Download
3 Web of Science
2 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Background
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a major risk factor for cervical cancer.
Methods
We evaluated the clinical significance of the HPV DNA chip genotyping assay (MyHPV chip, Mygene Co.) compared with the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) chemiluminescent nucleic acid hybridization kit (Digene Corp.) in 867 patients.
Results
The concordance rate between the MyHPV chip and HC2 was 79.4% (kappa coefficient, κ = 0.55). The sensitivity and specificity of both HPV tests were very similar (approximately 85% and 50%, respectively). The addition of HPV result (either MyHPV chip or HC2) to cytology improved the sensitivity (95%, each) but reduced the specificity (approximately 30%, each) compared with the HPV test or cytology alone. Based on the MyHPV chip results, the odds ratio (OR) for ≥ high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) was 9.9 in the HPV-16/18 (+) group and 3.7 in the non-16/18 high-risk (HR)-HPV (+) group. Based on the HC2 results, the OR for ≥ HSILs was 5.9 in the HR-HPV (+) group. When considering only patients with cytological diagnoses of “negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy” and “atypical squamous cell or atypical glandular cell,” based on the MyHPV chip results, the ORs for ≥ HSILs were 6.8 and 11.7, respectively, in the HPV-16/18 (+) group.
Conclusions
The sensitivity and specificity of the MyHPV chip test are similar to the HC2. Detecting HPV-16/18 with an HPV DNA chip test, which is commonly used in many Asian countries, is useful in assessing the risk of high-grade cervical lesions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Human papilloma virus identification in ocular surface squamous neoplasia by p16 immunohistochemistry and DNA chip test
Tina Shrestha, Won Choi, Ga Eon Kim, Jee Myung Yang, Kyung Chul Yoon
Medicine.2019; 98(2): e13944. CrossRef
Comparison of the PANArray HPV Genotyping Chip Test with the Cobas 4800 HPV and Hybrid Capture 2 Tests for Detection of HPV in ASCUS Women
Eun Young Ki, Yoon Kyung Lee, Ahwon Lee, Jong Sup Park
Yonsei Medical Journal.2018; 59(5): 662. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search